

the problem
Governance issues around the world continue to prove there are significant deficiencies in the processes and regulatory frameworks, that would protect the integrity of national democracies. In the best cases, governments have depended on the ethical quality of politicians to abide by unwritten, historical conventions for protection. Today the worst cases of abuse are highlighted by increasingly bold, despotic and corrupt leaders that count on the weakness of national law and subvert the function of democracy for personal gain.
On the best of days, we can expect good people to cooperate and build the best government they can, but we must also plan for the worst days, when we must rely on the strength of our civic institutions, the regulations that define and govern them, and the timely help of neighouring countries, to protect us from disaster and tyranny.
There have always been bad people attracted to the power of government. We know how to write robust rules that stop abusive behaviours. We need to make sure those rules are present at every level of government, everywhere and we must ensure they are constantly updated to protect against new forms of abuse.
The real problem is, there has never been a trusted custodian for these rules, outside the reach of the abuse and corruption they are designed to constrain. It is a profound conflict of interest for a government to be solely responsible for its own oversight.
GCHRD history
The
To gauge public support we travelled over 15,000 kilometres around Canada in 2015 to discuss these issues with citizens directly. We found a clear understanding of the importance of robust democratic process, and feedback we received strongly supported the need for independent process protections. This was reinforced by the high quality of public suggestions for extending the scope of process protections beyond the basic proposals used in our testing presentations. After 20 years of work on civics, it's clear that failure to address chronic governance issues by enacting even basic aspects of these protections, lay at the root of public discontent with politicians in general.
mission
The
The
new global civic structure
Beyond the need for a set of standards, the quality of deployment for democratic process is advanced through public measurement and reporting. Ultimately, the most important function of the
The analysis process will undoubtedly uncover new forms of circumvention and erosion as time passes, so an important response will be the publication of updated standards to address new abuses.
United Nations Organizations
• international deliberation, cooperation and dispute resolution
• representatives appointed by national governments
• voluntary participation by national governments
International Criminal Court
• prosecution of individuals for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and crimes of aggression
• representatives appointed by national governments
• voluntary participation by national governments
• national governments select judges
Human Rights and Democracy
• international standards of rights and democratic processes, certify government implementations
• oversight and public reporting on rights and process implementation
• voluntary participation by national governments
• citizens nominate their most trusted representatives from qualifying candidates
public commentary
The
Our tools are, social media comment on current events, and the publication of reports on major topics of process and rights. Our comments and reporting attempt to cast an objective light on the erosion, dysfunction and manipulation of democratic processes and universal human rights.
If your organization is advancing one of the issues within our scope of action, we would be happy to work with you to develop and promote commentary, analysis or reports on the subject.
If you are a member of government and wish to improve the strength of democracy in your country, we would be pleased to start a dialogue about shared goals.
